# Bitwig integration

**URL:** <https://discuss.lexicondj.com/t/bitwig-integration/3685>\
**Category:** Ideas & Feature Requests\
**Created:** [October 13, 2026, 12:28pm UTC](https://discuss.lexicondj.com/t/bitwig-integration/3685 "2026-10-13T12:28:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![t\_a](https://discuss.lexicondj.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/57b2e6/32.png) [@t\_a](https://discuss.lexicondj.com/u/t_a)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2026, 12:28pm UTC](https://discuss.lexicondj.com/t/bitwig-integration/3685/1 "2026-10-13T12:28:53Z")

</div>

[Bitwig just announced](https://www.bitwig.com/stories/bitwig-studio-rekordbox-integration-474/) an integration with Rekordbox. You can access the RB library directly in Bitwig and most of the metadata is being used as well. It would be pretty cool to do that directly with the LXC library since that is my single source of truth. I’m aware that this needs more work on Bitwigs end but I believe it would help if you reach out to them. Unlike Ableton, they’re more open minded and more daring to innovate. What do you think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Christiaan](https://discuss.lexicondj.com/user_avatar/discuss.lexicondj.com/christiaan/32/10_2.png) [@Christiaan](https://discuss.lexicondj.com/u/Christiaan)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2026, 4:53pm UTC](https://discuss.lexicondj.com/t/bitwig-integration/3685/2 "2026-10-13T16:53:21Z")

</div>

I guess you’d have to ask them since most work is on their end. But I doubt they would be interested in it, Rekordbox is probably an exception for them because it has many more users than Lexicon